Jump to content

Talk:Cook, Serve, Delicious!/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aoba47 (talk · contribs) 00:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I hope that it is okay that I pick up this article for a review. I will do this in a more piecemeal fashion so apologies in advance. Feel free to comment on anything and make any revisions as you do not have to wait until the full review is posted. I will look through the citation formatting at the end.

Infobox and lead

[edit]

I hope these comments are helpful so far. I will add more comments tomorrow. Let me know if you have any questions. I hope you are having a good weekend so far. Aoba47 (talk) 00:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay and premise

[edit]

Here are some further comments. Aoba47 (talk) 01:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Development and release

[edit]

Reception

[edit]
  • I do not think it is particularly helpful to include the scares in the prose, and I believe it would be better to focus on the actual review itself. If you would like to have the scores present in the article, I would use the video game reviews template for that.
    • Well, generally the rule is that you shouldn't put the scores in the body if they are in the table, but there are so few reviews that I felt the table was unneccesary, and we could say them in the body. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 08:21, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      • I just do not find the scores to be particularly insightful in the prose (unless there is something out of the ordinary about it, like this was one of the few times a game got a perfect score from a specific publisher, etc.), but it is likely a matter of personal preference. Aoba47 (talk) 19:03, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The prose in this section could use further work. It reads more like a list, especially since most of the sentences start with X critic of Y publication. Would it be possible to expand on some of these sentences? There are a few points where I am not really getting what the reviewer is discussing. For instance, I am not entirely sure what Mal Scott is saying about the game, other than that he apparently enjoyed it.

Sequels

[edit]

This should be all of my comments for now. Once everything has been addressed, I will read through the article again. Please let me know if you have any questions about my review. Have a great rest of your weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 23:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]