Talk:Conwy town walls/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk • contribs • count) 18:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Nicely done.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   A picture of the upper gate with the remains of its barbican would be useful if one can be found.

I can't find one unfortunately; I agree it would be good. Ironically I was there a few months ago, but didn't know about the barbican at the time! Next time though, I'll make sure I get a decent photo of it.Hchc2009 (talk) 17:13, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

1. Overall:

   Pass or Fail: