Talk:Convoy PQ 2

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	World War II task force

Expansion

Background and Prelude from Convoy PQ 8 parachuted in, suitably adapted. Keith-264 (talk) 10:48, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Convoy formation table

I don't understand what this table is telling us. (Hohum ^@) 14:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After some searching: Pendant numbers?

These numbers were given to vessels before leaving port and indicate their position in convoy. The first one (or two) numbers denote the column and the last number denotes the row. For example, Pdt. 112 means that the ship was in column 11 and there was one vessel ahead of it.

http://www.convoyweb.org.uk/oskms/notes.htm

(Hohum ^@) 15:15, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see it's already explained with a note on a later table in the article. I suggest naming the efn note, and adding it to the first table too. (Hohum ^@) 15:37, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note added to first table. Table adjusted for simpler syntax and condensed format. (Hohum ^@) 15:45, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hohum: Thanks, it's an experiment so not finished and all suggestions are welcome. How can I alter the format to make sure that the ship names stay under the position number (the longer names go below the number and the shorter ones don't) would making the table wider do it? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the efn rather than duplicate it and tried to find a way to get the photo of the destroyer (filling whitespace) to align with column 1 etc to no avail. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you use the same format as I've used in the table, the ship names should always be under the number, no matter their width. (Hohum ^@) 18:05, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hohum: Ta I haven't decided if putting these in helps improve the article but I might try doing a series of them for PQ 18 to show losses. Keith-264 (talk) 15:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]