Talk:Convoy ON 154

Military history: Maritime / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	World War II task force

ON-154 or ONS-154? Drutt (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Either is correct. ON-154 was the 154th of the ON-series convoys beginning in July of 1941. Alternate convoys of the ON-series were comprised of slower ships (hence the "S"); so the sequence is variously identified as "...ON-151, ON-152, ON-153, ON-154, ON-155..." or "...ON-151, ONS-152, ON-153, ONS-154, ON-155..." or "...ON(F)-151, ON(S)-152, ON(F)-153, ON(S)-154, ON(F)-155..." Slow ships were assigned a separate ONS series beginning with the number ONS-1 in March of 1943. I used the ON-154 title to identify this as the 154th convoy of the original ON series rather than a member of the later ONS-series. Thewellman (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see that makes sense. Thank you for your work on this page. Drutt (talk) 05:59, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why was the convoy bringing ammo to NA? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.63.82.163 (talk) 18:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hague (p.161) indicates Empire Shackleton carried 2000 tons general cargo including ammunition and aircraft. I speculate the ammunition might have been from old naval inventories for use in ships being operated by Commonwealth forces such as the Canadian Western Local Escort Force based in Halifax Harbour. Thewellman (talk) 20:55, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Did more tables and added pics and maps, the positions of which aren't ideal but the text needs to be revised and expanded with material not available to earlier editors. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone mind If I used sfns, it's the only system I really know? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 08:49, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem here It is a better system than the current one. Llammakey (talk) 12:08, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The pages for the Milner volumes are wrong, poss vice-versa. 2do2morrow Keith-264 (talk) 20:42, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've decided that I want to look in the OH RCN so will have to wait for it to arrive but will tinker with the narrative and citations to shift what I can away from websites to books. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 14:04, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]