Talk:Convergent beam electron diffraction
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Small part copied to Electron diffraction
[edit]Not much in it which is probably enough.
I also wonder why there is no further reading, for instance Spence & Zuo, or more advanced topics such as HOLZ, GM lines, charge refinement etc. I suggest adding something along those lines in a short section. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]For User:Koogid, as I don't want to be duplicate editing and you may already have these:
- Bernard Buxton worked for John Steeds, and John took the work much further so I think should be referenced.
- 4D STEM is CBED at 0.2nm, so the 100nm for CBED is ancient. There is the much earlier work of John Cowley and also John Spence
- John Steeds' coherent STEM is the father of 4D
- There are a couple of nice montages from Nestor in Electron diffraction you might want to use, and a few other references
- Remember that the discs are only roughly at "Bragg" positions
Ldm1954 (talk) 15:06, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for valuable remarks. It would be great if you could add that information into the article. Koogid (talk) 16:08, 30 September 2023 (UTC)