Jump to content

Talk:Converged network adapter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Issues

[edit]

Besides the obvious punctuation errors, there are some issues with this. It seems close to a marketing blurb, using the present tense and mostly presents products without any history. The idea of combining a storage adapter (HBA) with a network interface (NIC) has been around for a long time. They were at one time for example called CNIC (pronounced "scenic", get it?) when they supported iSCSI and one Gigabit Ethernet about eight years ago. Just because a new batch of marketing folks have coined a new neologism does not mean we should ignore other instances of the same concept. And just because marketing folks love to acronymize, does not make this a proper name, so the convention would be to use lower case, e.g. Converged network adapter. Alas, the redirect is already there, which means we need administrator intervention to move. In the meanwhile the article needs help. W Nowicki (talk) 19:08, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi W Nowicki, I can understand your concerns and I intend to change the article shortly. The reason why this now seems a summary of sales-brochures is because for quite a while it was a little questionalble if there would come broad support for the technique and there was the risk that there would only be a very limited number of CNA's available on the market and then made by companies that aren't anything big on the NIC or LPM (chipset/ADIC) market (eg Brocade: they do make switches for FC and after buying Foundry Networks) also in the high-end ethernet switch market (L2, L3 and L4-7 switches) but they weren't know as a company that delivered chipsets to the large server vendors like HP, IBM and Dell. But the growing support from the storage market (EQL, NetApp, EMC) and in the end of 2K9 the entrance of Broadcom allowed a breakthrough of the technique FCoE: a problem is a bit where to put this information (under FCoE article or under CNA article) and I do need to find proper public sources (I do have an internal Dell article, but I can't quote from it as it is strictly internal).

So I limited it so far to this list which is -at least imho- under Wiki Q standards but I hope to extend article with similar info as above but then with proper sources. Tonkie (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Converged network adapter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Converged_network_adapter&oldid=1247623379"