Talk:Convair B-36 Peacemaker variants

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

I do not really understand the purpose of this page. It has the XB, YB and -A model? This does not make sense to me. Shouldn't this page, if anything, be a more indepth discussion of the XC-99 and YB-60? If it is intended to cover all variants then there is much more work to be done.Patrick Berry 17:46, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I started it some time ago and haven't finished it. My apologies. Ingoolemo ^talk 19:27, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, no worries, I will try to help out with it then. You thinking just the B-36A-J plus XB and YB?Patrick Berry 19:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think if the references could be cleaned up and perhaps more citations added this could be a GA, right now I'm thinking just less than a B-class. --Colputt 18:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)][reply]

Sad to see that this article hasn't progressed in what 14 years. For those interested in learning about the major operational versions of this imporant (and impressive) aircraft, here is an online series of articles: http://www.joebaugher.com/usaf_bombers/b36.html (ol' Joe's webpages are very interesting and accurate - far more accurate than the corresponding Wiki pages).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Convair B-36 variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]