Talk:Controlled foreign corporation
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Opening heading
[edit]What are the tax advantages and disadvantages of a US Corporation setting up a CFC?
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:52, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Controlled Foreign Corporation → Controlled foreign corporation –
Mentions such a thing for several countries, so clearly generic. Per WP:MOSCAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. In addition, WP:MOSCAPS says that a compound item should not be upper-cased just because it is abbreviated with caps. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 15:30, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Yep, definitely a generic term and should be de-capitalised. Jenks24 (talk) 09:46, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
A Russian source lists: Австралия, Аргентина, Великобритания, Венгрия, Германия, Дания, Израиль, Индонезия, Испания, Италия, Канада, Китай, Мексика, Новая Зеландия, Норвегия, США, Турция, Финляндия, Франция, Швеция, ЮАР, Южная Корея, Япония[1] Please verify and update the article. - üser:Altenmann >t 02:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Controlled foreign corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090717001251/http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/intmanual/INTM202020.htm to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/intmanual/INTM202020.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090717001251/http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/intmanual/INTM202020.htm to http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/intmanual/INTM202020.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:25, 12 August 2017 (UTC)