Talk:Contrast-induced nephropathy

Medicine: Radiology / Nephrology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Radiology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Nephrology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Contrast-induced nephropathy.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Prognosis

Is the nephropathy permanent or how long does it last ? Rod57 (talk) 15:51, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Usually lasts 5-10 days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.115.83.140 (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Under 'prophylactic hemodialysis" the reference does not seem to point correctly. At least, following it and getting the article and reading it does not seem to suggest this. In fact, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747848 seems to refute it! I'm not a doctor so some clarification would help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.199.20 (talk) 08:00, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So what?

This article describes the parameters of contrast-induced nephropathy, but it does not say that it is a problem. Does it matter if somebody gets this condition? You might think so because it has "pathy" in the name, but for all I can tell from what is written here, it does not have any significance to the patient. 130.167.180.22 (talk) 16:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Does it exist?

Not necessarily doi:10.1148/radiol.12121460 JFW | T@lk 21:41, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

... in Circulation doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.014672 JFW | T@lk 15:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acetylcysteine works...

... in people who have low-osmolality contrast media in particular: doi:10.7326/M15-1456. In comparison, no LOCM was associated with more CIN than the other doi:10.7326/M15-1402 JFW | T@lk 09:50, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contrast-induced nephropathy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080817051529/http://www.intmed.mcw.edu/clincalc/creatinine.html to http://www.intmed.mcw.edu/clincalc/creatinine.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:00, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Contrast-induced nephropathy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101217045112/http://www.cormedix.com/news_6_25_10.php to http://www.cormedix.com/news_6_25_10.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Signs & Symptoms

Shouldnt there be a signs and symptoms section of thos article on a medical outcome? Not to mention this article seems a little one sided by someone with an agenda to prove this doesn’t ever happen. Even had multiple of the same places cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.20.194.86 (talk) 06:04, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]