Talk:Contraharmonic mean
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This article has not been verified to be mathematically accurate, as my skills in mathematics are not quite up to snuff. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 20:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
this article is correct, the sources are verifiable, and all of the math checks out perfectly. it seems this article has been tagged for a while...i'm going to make the bold move and remove the clean up tags.Essap 03:19, 6 May 2007 (UTC)essap
Quibbles with wording
[edit]The math in this article checks out well, but it does not "check out perfectly" as Essap claims. I also think the presentation of the material could use a lot of improvement. Some if it is confusing. Some of it is bad style. I made a list of quibbles, but it was getting too long, so I deleted it and replaced it with this shorter message. When I have time, I will be more explicit. Mathmoose (talk) 05:11, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Alternate name
[edit]The contraharmonic mean is also known as the antiharmonic mean (or possibly anti-harmonic, to appease the spell checker). Mathmoose (talk) 06:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Application
[edit]The antiharmonic mean is related to compound or composed pendulums. The details in my sources are too vague to be of use. Does anybody have more specific details? Mathmoose (talk) 06:03, 26 January 2009 (UTC)