Talk:Contradictions Collapse

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Metal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg

Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg

Image:Meshuggah-Contradictions.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:04, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Contradictions Collapse

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Contradictions Collapse's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Official bio":

From Meshuggah discography: Espn. "A short biography". www.meshuggah.net. Archived from the original on 2007-05-13. Retrieved 2007-05-16. {{cite web}}: External link in |publisher= (help)
From Meshuggah: Espn. "A short biography". meshuggah.net. Archived from the original on 2008-11-16. Retrieved 2007-05-16.

Reference named "AMG bio":

From Meshuggah: Jason Ankeny and Bradley Torreano. "Meshuggah Biography". Allmusic. Retrieved 2008-05-11.
From Meshuggah discography: Jason Ankeny and Bradley Torreano. "Meshuggah Biography". Allmusic. Retrieved 2008-05-11.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Genres

Hi, I don't think alternative metal should be a genre listed so I am giving a week for any comments and then I will remove it. Lukejordan02 (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[taken from my talk page] I think Allmusic defines alternative metal differently from Wikipedia, here on Wikipedia it's defined as heavier, more experimental grunge/alternative rock music from the early 90s, while on Allmusic nu metal, groove metal and alternative metal are usually defined as the exact same thing

On the Allmusic alternative metal page it explains "At its outset, alternative metal was a style united by its nonconformist sensibility rather than any immediately classifiable sound. Heavy metal was at the core of the music, but the bands were too offbeat and their influences too eclectic to fit into the thrash underground" while on the page for this album they state "In contrast to their later, more progressive-oriented work, the album generally falls into the alternative metal category, with ultra-heavy riffs and hints of hip-hop or industrial dance in the drum patterns." They must regard this album as alternative metal since it didn't quite fit into the thrash metal underground with it's eccentric influences, while at the same time not quite being progressive metal either. I call the big one bitey (talk) 03:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The guidelines recommend as few genres as possible so I think Thrash Metal & Progressive Metal should be more than enough to cover it because if we keep Alternative Metal then why not add Jazz Fusion and so on and then where does it end? Lukejordan02 (talk) 03:13, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The source is pretty explicit: "the album generally falls into the alternative metal category". You don't get much more blatant than that, and Allmusic is considered reliable on Wikipedia (per WP:ALBUM/SOURCES). I don't see a good reason to remove it, especially since it's the only thing in this article that is actually sourced (and in fact, it contradicts "progressive metal"). I'm sure there are other sources out there that talk about the album's thrash metal, and possibly about progressive metal (although I wouldn't be surprised if there weren't, seeing as this album wasn't all that "progressive"). But no, I don't think "alternative metal" should be removed. MrMoustacheMM (talk) 03:48, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Meshuggah contradictons-collapse reissue.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:54, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]