Talk:Contractual term
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Contractual term article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| A summary of this article appears in Contract. |
This article seems to be based completely on British law. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.84.122.85 (talk) 16:58, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Agreed and it would really be nice to have a description as to what it means to be implied in fact vs. implied in law. At the current time, there is no more than the set of factors these courts chose to test whether the terms could be implied. 65.125.220.4 (talk) 00:54, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
These articles are almost word-by-word the same: Contractual_terms_in_English_law and Contractual_term It should be merged and redirection set. ArchiSchmedes Talk 07:21, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
Nonsense
[edit]"Wong Mee Wan v Kwan Kin Travel Services Ltd.[19] established that when a tour operator contracts to for the sale of goods." What is this supposed to say? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.231.27.248 (talk) 22:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- That bit of nonsense actually predates this article. It was caused by some vandalism from way back in 2007 before this article was split off from Contract. It took a good bit of digging but I think I've fixed it now. Hairy Dude (talk) 00:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK N.A.
[edit]How does this financial institutional work DT1967! (talk) 21:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)