Talk:Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of cells.

Disambiguation

Can someone do the title and disambiguation links so that "CERA" can redirect here? I have no idea how to do links, etc. in Wikipedia. Thx.06:37, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

The disambiguation is in place. -- Iterator12n ^Talk 15:13, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge?

There is a suggestion to merge two articles: “Methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta” and “Continuous erythropoietin receptor activator.” My take, for the time being: No. CERA is a category of drugs, including but not limited to methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta. So the question becomes, Do we write an article about a category, or an article about a member of the category, or an article for each? As long as we don’t know for sure whether methoxy has unique characteristics not present in other CERAs, I think we should keep the two articles apart, even if there is an overlap between them. -- Iterator12n ^Talk 15:06, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Iterator12n is correct in stating that the PEG does not need to be methoxyPEG for synthesis of a CERA from EPO. The two articles should be linked, but not merged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.198.38.244 (talk) 17:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-sports section needs more references

There are plenty of references in the 'illegal use' section, but only one in the intro/main body of the article. SpecMode (talk) 04:16, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]