Talk:Contiguity

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

‹See TfM›

Physics

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles

Dab page & split ?

Shouldn't this have been a disambiguation page instead? :-. EverGreg 18:22, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second that. Staszek Lem (talk) 01:28, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rewording the lead

While reading the definition of continguity, I preferred to rephrase it by reordering the same words:

The Law of Contiguity (one of Aristotle's Laws of Association) refers to the fact that things that are readily associated occur in proximity to each other in time or space. This is a somewhat different statement than the former "things that occur in proximity to each other in time or space are readily associated."

I say this because ... it is much easier to conclude or see association in "two spies met (association) on the bus (time & space/place)" than it is to conclude or see association in "two men who met on the bus are spies (or associated at all)".

-- Mighty_Mouse_1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.125.129.252 (talk) 14:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Under "biology"

This is not even a sentence, just a noun phrase without meaning:

"A cluster of genes that are located close to one another at a chromosome locus."

85.224.168.67 (talk) 16:02, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistics?

I just saw contiguity discussed in relation to linguistics and structuralism. Is there enough there to add a new section? Aristophanes68 (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Contiguity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]