Talk:Content reference identifier
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Talk
[edit]Surely a CRID is a URI, not just like one? Just as URNs are URIs? nick (talk) 00:36, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
New title "CRID" instead of "Crid"
[edit]Could please somebody change the title of this article from "Crid" (mixed case) to "CRID" (upper case)?
---> http://downloads.bbc.co.uk/rd/pubs/whp/whp-pdf-files/WHP148.pdf
141.3.192.143 (talk) 14:00, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Too many references?
[edit]Hello User:Thorwald, I think that the two technical specifications "ETSI TS 102 822-2 V1.4.1 (2007-11)" and "ETSI TS 102 822-4 V1.7.1 (2012-12)" should be cited in the "References" section of the CRID article. From my point of view, these two ETSI standards are even more important than RFC 4078 which is only an "informational" RFC. -- 2A00:1398:4:0:1845:B86C:EF41:ECC8 (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2013 (UTC)