Jump to content

Talk:Consumer confidence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More than ever one can somewhat understand the driving force behind the "Tea Party" phenomenon. It is being used as a tool to keep people overly pessimistic about Government and the State of the country. Well when you parallel that with the "Party of No's" operation of voting no on everything it becomes quite clear as to whats going on. These folk want to orchestrate and maintain the worst "Consumer Confidence" levels that they can in an vast effort to circumvent a successful economic rebound as headed by the Obama administration. Stoking the fires of suspicion, and distrust by slander outright lies and misrepresentations are what some hope will be their ticket back into the White House and controlling the Congress. This is non-leadership, anarchy, and treason at it's worst but now the covers are beginning to be pulled off. I predict that the November elections will surprise them and they will not make the gains in the Congress that they have predicted. And to think, a lot of this is being led by a half-governor, who seeks to make a career out of talking against the President of the United States (to much of the delight to the Iranian President and every terrorist who's ever slitherd from behind a rock), and her half-baked cohort from Minnesota.

GfK NOP Consumer Confidence Barometer

[edit]

The link is broken and I can't find one that works. Chris Martin (talk) 09:05, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Dees's comment on this article

[edit]

Dr. Dees has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:


What about the indices for other European countries. Those are also aggregated and published by the European Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/db_indicators/surveys/index_en.htm). The part on usage is very poor and lacks references. References to a huge literature on how these indices are used in economics are missing.


We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

We believe Dr. Dees has expertise on the topic of this article, since he has published relevant scholarly research:


  • Reference : Stephane Dees & Jochen Guntner, 2014. "The International Dimension of Confidence Shocks," Economics working papers 2014-05, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 19:04, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Consumer confidence. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]