Talk:Constitutional theory

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Who should be include as a constitutional theory "thinker"?

I agree with many of those listed on the thinkers section, with the possible exception of Alex Kozinski. Influential and well-respected jurist? Certainly. Constitutional theorist? Probably not. To my knowledge, although he has authored excellent opinions that certainly touch on questions of interpretation and constitutional powers, he has not written works of constitutional and legal theory similar to either Antonin Scalia or Richard Posner.

Some discussion on this topic would be good. I'd like to propose removing Judge Kozinski, but would like to hear from others, first. Chart123 18:28, 19 April 2006 (UTC) so this would be good — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.203.32.135 (talk) 13:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is not about the topic 'Constitutional theory'...

it is on the topic 'Constitutional theory in the United States.' Doprendek (talk) 04:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Constitutional theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060518093905/http://www.econlib.org:80/LIBRARY/Buchanan/buchCv7Contents.html to http://www.econlib.org/library/Buchanan/buchCv7Contents.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. {{Jim.henderson (talk) 22:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)}}[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who should be include as a constitutional theory "thinker"?

This is *not* about the topic 'Constitutional theory'...

External links modified

This is not about the topic 'Constitutional theory'...