Talk:Constitutional Court of Spain

Spain High‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Mid‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Constitutional Court of Spain appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 December 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that in 2005 the Constitutional Court of Spain ruled that Spanish courts may hear cases regarding genocide in which there were no Spanish victims, thereby reversing a decision of the country's Supreme Court?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/December.

Wikipedia

Content from Country Studies

Text from Country Studies is public domain. So I've copied some content from it, and surrounded copied content with comments  and . Once those parts are significantly modified, you can remove those tags. -- SilverStar ★ 04:50, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Update 2010-07-08

Missing is information on

the current composition and its problems
the catalan descision

--Oneiros (talk) 20:19, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of Constitutionality as the "Supreme Interpreter" of the constitution

First, I have read the entire Constitution in English and Espanol, there is nothing in it that says the constitutional court holds the supreme authority/interpretation to the constitution.

Second, the link attached as a footnote to where it says in this article that the Constitutional Court is supreme interpreter is broken. It leads to a page that doesn't offer any information.

Third, the true supreme authority to any Constitution should be Logic, not coercion. If you are using coercion in any form in place of compliance through reasoning then your government is automatically embarking on an interest of tyrannical conduct.

Off-topic ranting, but please don't use the United States for how your government should function. The UK and Canadian interpretation of the United States being founded by crooks and criminals is correct. America seceded from Britain because it wanted indigenous lands and did not believe the British government had any right to enforce its own decrees and laws. The taxation was a ploy by America to raise the cost of services and products even beyond where the tax was levied to insure an uprising would occur. Again, America was founded by Crooks and Criminals, thus entirely illegitimate as a reference for anything.

I know we want someone to just hold the final stay and force everyone in line, especially when we believe we are correct and the opposition is nothing but a bunch of lawbreakers. However, we need to utilize PBIS to insure their compliance and minimize their negative conduct. Therefore, if the constitution doesn't explicitly say something, then you cannot argue what the Catalonian government is doing as unconstitutional until you can find the explicit article in the constitution they are violating. Just the same as stipulating that the amendment of the statut of Catalonia's Community, when it is merely the same foundation as what is already utilized in the Basque Country. I am sorry, but Spain ended its right to being a sovereign country the moment they showed their lack of competence was even greater than Belgrade's. ~ Prince of Catalonia — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.82.33.109 (talk) 13:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]