Talk:Conservation Reserve Program

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

It doesn't seem healthy to state that blip about non-farmers and urbanites finding the program controversial (at least not without expounding) -- suggesting it is just "a way for farmers/big ag to get federal dollars without having to plant anything".

Indeed, it is the landowners responsibility to seed the land with appropriate plant and grass seed, at market costs. It is also the landowners responsibility to maintain the land according to standards. It is not a free ride.

Additionally, many of the same said 'non-farmers' and 'urbanites' represent a certain duplicity... sharing the same environmental and land/wildlife preservation goals that programs like this make possible; and providing opportunities for sportsman by increasing and improving hunting land.

I've begun to collect resources on land programs and conservation... here are some of my bookmarks:

http://del.icio.us/emjayess/Conservation

emjayess 20:58, 29 November 2006 (UTC)Emjayess[reply]

I don't think the reference to non-farmers and urbanites is a problem since there are clearly a number of people with this belief, so removing it would be censorship (WP:NOT#CENSORED). In fact, I believe referring to these people as "non-farmers" and especially "urbanites" violates neutral point of view. While there are probably not many farmers with similar beliefs, this implies that these people are not knowledgeable about the subject, and the titles are not really necessary in the first place, since these views aren't necessarily confined to these groups. Urukagina 03:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some Farmers view the program as an effort to destroy the family farm, since families do not need to live on CRP land in order to maintain it, and their absence in large numbers has devastated many small farming communities.

Boronx Sept. 20, 2007

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Conservation Reserve Program. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090106023835/http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/farmbills/conservation-expanded.html to http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/farmbills/conservation-expanded.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:36, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unusal things in the text

The text has several "[7]" and "{10]" which, to me, look like the text was directly copied from some source that was using references. Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 22:33, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]