Talk:Consciousness-based healthcare

Doesn't this article seem biased to you?

This is the very first time I've written anything in Wikipedia. The reason I decided to write is that this (almost exclusively written by one person) article on Consciousness-based healthcare seems overly favorable to this approach and I believe it may be biased. I would like to request that more experienced editors view it and, hopefully, point to any inconsistencies or shortcomings, perhaps making some additions or remarks. Thanks.--Axanthios (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment: I initiated this article with the expectation that others would expand upon the topic, though hopefully not "attack" or try to discredit it out of ignorance or malice. This emerging field of healthcare is quickly growing and merits coverage in Wikipedia. Someone needed to start a page on it, and I have a lot of knowledge in this area. People want information about CBH that doesn't come from sources that either are trying to sell them something or are blindly attacking anything not yet widely accepted by the mainstream. (The latter is something I have observed happening a lot on Wikipedia on pages that cover "alternative" healthcare approaches.) The information included here is well documented, but of course does not represent all points of view. My hope is that others who are genuinely interested in CBH will expand on what I have written in a constructive manner. --Zephyr22 (talk) 02:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

This article is being censored!

Since the 2012-02 comment (below), this page has been extensively revised to have a tone of neutrality. In 2012-12 the page was "edited" by someone that apparently is completely ignorant of the subject. A large amount of well-documented material was deleted and replaced by inaccurate information that either was devoid of references or had references that were unrelated to the content. On 2012-12-30, I restored the factual, documented material and welcome others who are knowledgeable on the subject to add well-documented information to round out the page. The "editor" who decimated it has continued to make revisions that include inaccurate and non-sourced information - edits that have the hallmarks of censorship of a controversial topic. When I restored much of the sourced information, this person deleted the entire page and had it redirect to another page that has (according to Wikipedia) "multiple issues." --Zephyr22 (talk) 22:36, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Zephyr22

NPOV

The autohor's are possibly in violation of WP:NPOV. Topic is in need of valid references WP:REF. This is not a place for original research, WP:OR Jettparmer (talk) 14:49, 3 January 2013 (UTC)