Talk:Connexions (agency)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biased Article

This whole article seems a bit biased to me. I suspect it may have been written by someone who would like to show Connexions in a positive light. In particular the line stating 'As a result they are a shining example, in theory as well as in practice, of joined up government at the level of delivery.'. I work for Connexions and myself, my colleauges and other agencies wouldn't agree with this line at all. Besides you can't prove that this is the case. If I can find an article backing me up I indend to change the entry. --Adam281 15:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

True. Plus they're massive pests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.252.240.14 (talk) 00:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They make me very paranoid. I don't trust the Cambridge branch one little bit, even less when they're pandering to people like me in their late teens. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.66.205.157 (talk) 14:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adam281, I concur with your observations relating to the sentence you provided. It seems that the article has since been cleaned up -- feel free to raise any additional concerns that you may have. To the two anonymous editors whom forgot to sign, thank you for your utterly useless comments. Cheers --Bossi (talk ;; contribs) 23:38, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree , I think this article is wrong and misleading. Connexions was set up by a load of know nothings with no research. Unfortunately , it became a brand name for all sorts of political endeavours.!! I worked there. Confusions !!!Sharon PC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.182.50 (talk) 21:11, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Connexions Card

It shares the name, but has no other relationship with the agency. It's an entirely separate contract that has no connection to it.Goatchurch 19:08, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

split into Connexions Card ninety:one^{(school account)} 10:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dinosaurs

I'm guessing this text from the "Delivery," section needs reverting, "There are Connexions Centres around the country - usually dinosaurs in each county - will offer support and advice"