Talk:Connecticut Four

Libraries Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge discussion

Oppose merge. Most certainly notable topic in its own right. — Cirt (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very disrespectful to the reader

The first sentence of this article tells us something happened to something called "Library Connection", apparently just presupposing that the reader has heard of something called "Library Connection" and knows what it is.

After the first four long sentences it tells us that the Connecticut Four also did something or other, and we can surmise that "the Connecticut Four" may be plaintiffs or petitioners in a lawsuit, but that is left to surmise. How the number _four_ was arrived at we must also guess.

"were honored by the ALA". That's what it says. Perhaps informing us explicitly of what "the ALA" is wouldn't hurt, but if that's too much, is a link to an article about it too much?

Michael Hardy (talk) 18:16, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've reorganized the article, including compliance with the policy on setting the title phrase in bold at its first appearance. Michael Hardy (talk) 19:01, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]