Talk:Congress of Durrës

Congress of Durrës was nominated as a History good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 14, 2016). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Albania High‑importance

	Congress of Durrës is part of the WikiProject Albania, an attempt to co-ordinate articles relating to Albania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page so as to become familiar with the guidelines. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.AlbaniaWikipedia:WikiProject AlbaniaTemplate:WikiProject AlbaniaAlbania articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Congress of Durrës/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 15:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Will review this. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 15:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers! Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 18:45, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mondiad: I have added all my comments below: Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 09:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Can we avoid repeating the month in December 25 to December 27, 1918?
The lead should be expanded so that it covers all aspects of the article

Background

Source for the first para?
It may be helpful to add the time period of World War I
made itself a sufficient publicity Should this not be "made for itself"?
"newspaper "The Sun"" I think it should be "newspaper The Sun"
while WWI was not still over You should say "First World War" or any one name consistently throughout the article to refer to WWI.

Preparations

By the end of World War I Consistency in referring to WWI
The first para and the para before "Congress of Tiranë" are apparently sourced.
Some paras should be combined so that the section does not look choppy.
would server as a domestic support Did you mean "serve"?
Albanian newspaper "The Nation" Double quotes not needed
on November 3–4, 1918 Does it mean "from November 3 to 4"? Same for The Congress of Tirana was held on 19–20 December
This half-government should not I think it should be "would not"

Events

Add a citation to the end of the intro.
They came from most Albanian regions, which were under Italian occupation The comma is not needed, I think. I assume it does not mean they came mostly from Albanian regions.
A few subsections after the list would help navigation easier.
In addition to the delegates' list "In addition to these delegates"
in Mars 1921 (vol.54, p. 155) What does this mean?
Vlora is linked after the list, but it is mentioned before the list and should be linked there
self determination Should this not have a dash?
I think the quote in italics would look better in a quote template.
which were expressed by Mehmet Konica's words on December 26 Can this read "which were expressed by Mehmet Konica on December 26 as:"
Hikmet Bey Delvina A redlink, so you should add a few words to introduce this person.
Meanwhile, Hikmet Bey Delvina said...the national meeting. Source?

Italian reaction

Can the Balkans be wikilinked?

Outcome

Apparently unsourced:

(The list would change later, other names...basic issues related to Albania.
First, on the political level,...Albanian state already formed.
Second, it rejected any decision...France and/or England.
The congress rejected point V ...central Albania.

Governmental programme

Despite the decisions taken, Albania was still under foreign occupation. Source?

Aftermath

The new government did not last long... although the head of state issue was still pending. Source?
A retrospective view shows that... the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Source?
A retrospective view shows that Sounds like original research.

There is some trouble in citation 6.

That should be all. Would be glad to pass once these are addressed. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 09:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Mondiad: It's already 10 days since the review began. If there is no response within 3 days, I will be forced to fail this nomination. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 13:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Too late, I must fail this. I hope this is renominated soon after the above issues have been fixed. Sainsf <^>_{Feel at home} 04:27, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Congress of Durrës. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]