Talk:Congleton Players

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 4 November 2023 by reviewer Johannes Maximilian (talk · contribs).

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Cheshire

	Cheshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cheshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cheshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CheshireWikipedia:WikiProject CheshireTemplate:WikiProject CheshireCheshire articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Theatre

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Maurice Oly (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (Actor, all edits)

Issues

@Trainsandotherthings:

In regards to you declining of this draft, I disagree with your assessment that this draft does not meet GNG.

I accept your issue with the past production section, I feel all the other sections do make this draft meet GNC. The Noda awards the Congleton Players have won, the shared one act plays award with Seimans and the Seimans in the community award.

Surly those help with meeting GNC. And the NODA awards in the article are only the ones I have a source for, so the Congleton Players may have won more NODA awards then I’ve listed.

I am willing to cut the past productions sections down to just the important performances. These being:

The first production: Polly with a Past (25-28 1936)
The last production at the old players hall: Night Must Fall March 1978)
The first production at Daneside Theatre: Curtain Up (3-6 October 1984)
Congleton Players first sole production at Daneside theatre: Dear Octopus (8-12 January 1985) Maurice Oly (talk) 20:47, 4 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First off, we are referring to WP:GNG, the general notability guideline. GNC sells supplements.

If you want this draft to be accepted, you need to demonstrate the theater group has significant coverage in multiple reliable independent secondary sources. Not just trivial or routine mentions (and reviews of plays are routine). Awards do not automatically make a theater group notable (and I see no indication a NODA award is something extraordinary); otherwise I could write an article about my high school theater program which won awards at the state level while I was a member. GNG asks for multiple examples of significant coverage. Please show me your best three sources. With that said, please be accepting of the reality that this theater group likely has no notability of its own, and should be incorporated into the Daneside Theatre article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question could I use Hansard as proof of notability in this talk section? I'm not sure if I can use it in the article.
By the way I'm not giving it as one of my best three yet, this is just a question to check if I can use it in this talk section. Maurice Oly (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]