Jump to content

Talk:Confessions of an English Opium-Eater

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Expansion

[edit]

This book is really a staple of literature in European modernity. Is this really all there is? Please, expand on it. JoeSmack Talk 19:32, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confessions of an English Opium-Eater. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:57, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On Poe, at bit disingenuous to call it "praise".

[edit]

" Edgar Allan Poe praised Confessions for its "glorious imagination—deep philosophy—acute speculation". "

A bit disingenuous to call it "praise" as it was written as satire.

The full line from Poe's "How to write a Blackwood Article " is : "Then we had the ‘Confessions of an Opium-eater’ — fine, very fine! — glorious imagination — deep philosophy — acute speculation — plenty of fire and fury, and a good spicing of the decidedly unintelligible. That was a nice bit of flummery, and went down the throats of the people delightfully. They would have it that Coleridge wrote the paper — but not so. It was composed by my pet baboon, Juniper, over a rummer of Hollands and water, hot, without sugar." Exoir (talk) 11:07, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]