Talk:Confederate States dollar

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Numismatics: American currency B‑class Mid‑importance

	Numismatics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numismatics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of numismatics and currencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumismaticsWikipedia:WikiProject NumismaticsTemplate:WikiProject Numismaticsnumismatic articles
B	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American currency task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Military history: North America / United States / American Civil War C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	American Civil War task force

Name

Shouldn't this be named "Confederate States of America currency"? Especially since it talks about coins also. I think so, and will now make this rename. If it is wrong, revert it. Herostratus 14:48, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed the move, and I think it should still be at CSA dollar. All other currency articles are named that way (like United States dollar which is directly analogous). I don't see the relevance of the fact that the coins are included. I won't move it back though before giving you a chance to comment. Ingrid 01:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK, if you say, I certainly don't know the correct answer, so go ahead. Herostratus 00:28, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Value

Is Confederate money worth anything anymore, like to a collector, or is it just one of those things where it's nice to have but has no value as a collector's item? Emperor001 15:42, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It does have collector value, ranging from $10 to something that would only appear in an auction house. --ChoChoPK (球球PK) (talk | contrib) 20:32, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSA ten-cent notes, or only state ones?

My non-expert and very cursory scan of the Internet showed a couple of 10-cent notes issued by states, but (unlike 50-cent ones), none identifiable as Confederate States of America notes.

Does the language at Confederate States of America dollar#Banknotes need adjustment or clarification? If there are indeed CSA dime notes, then the first sentence might make it clearer that all those denominations are nationally-issued ones; if not then either the 10-cent denomination should be deleted (or moved to the phrase about state notes) or the sentence should make it clear that it covers both state and national issues. —— Shakescene (talk) 23:15, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Confederate 5 and 100 Dollars.jpg to appear as POTD soon

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Confederate 5 and 100 Dollars.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on December 26, 2012. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2012-12-26. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :) Thanks! —howcheng {chat} 19:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

Two banknotes for Confederate States of America dollars, in five (top) and 100 dollar (bottom) amounts. The notes were first issued just before the outbreak of the Civil War by the Confederacy. They were not backed by hard assets, but simply by a promise to pay the bearer after Confederate victory. By the end of the war, the notes were worthless. Today, the "Greybacks" are prized as collector's items.Restoration: Michael Holley

Archive – More featured pictures...

Why "Greyback" as a nickname for Confederate currency?

Greyback was a slang term for a Confederate soldier. The currency notes issued by the CSA have blue ink on the back. The USA notes had green ink on the back, and became called greenbacks. Why call bills with blue ink on the back greybacks? There are many references to CSA notes as "bluebacks", but this is the only place I can find that references them as "greybacks". GeorgeIIIFan (talk) 13:05, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. "Greyback" is the standard term. [1].Volunteer Marek 00:50, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ORish paragraph

The one that starts with "Near the end of the war, the currency became practically worthless as a medium of exchange.". The Confederate currency did not become worthless because it wasn't backed by any assets. Most of today's currencies (virtually all) are not backed by any assets either, yet they have value as mediums of exchange. The simple reasons why the currency became worthless are that 1) the Confederate government printed them like crazy as a means of financing the war which led to high inflation via standard monetary mechanisms and 2) as it became likely the South was going to loose the war there wasn't much point in holding on to a currency of a state that was going to cease to exist.

There might be some parallels with the Continentals but again, these will be the fact that issuance of both was associated with war finance, not the "not backed by hard assets" part.

Paragraphs needs less OR and more sources.Volunteer Marek 17:51, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the paragraph has problems. I'll make two observations:

1) While the CSA dollar wasn't backed by any assets, the northern greenbacks weren't either - and the greenback did not become worthless. Both the CSA and the US promised to redeem their paper dollars for gold - someday. But only the US government followed through. 2) I think much of the currency today is "sort of" backed by assets. For example, the US dollar and the Euro are backed by entities which hold sovereign bonds as assets. Of course, the bonds are denominated in the currency itself, so this is not too useful, but they are real assets. LondonYoung (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Confederate States dollar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219235458/http://www.mintmark.com/confederatehalfdollarscotttoken.html to http://www.mintmark.com/confederatehalfdollarscotttoken.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

merge Confederate state currencies

It's an unreferenced content fork, basically a list, and should be merged here.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:20, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 4 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Christensenc62202.

— Assignment last updated by Cgoral94 (talk) 05:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Individual states' currencies?

I'm aware that individual Confederate states also issued their own paper notes, whether they be considered treasury bonds or something else, they were intended as currency. Florida, Mississippi, and other confederate states issued their own notes, but that is not even mentioned in this article, much less covered.

Example of a Florida one dollar bill

Example of Mississippi 100 dollar bill

Other examples of confederate "treasury warrants"

-- Keith D. Tyler ¶ 07:43, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps they would fit better in list article, perhaps something along the lines of List of state currencies of the Confederate States. We could still mention the existence of the state currencies, but to cover them in depth would likely be outside the scope of the article. - ZLEA _T\^C 16:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]