Talk:Cone beam reconstruction

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The fourth paragraph of the introduction says nothing as to why two methods exist: why measurements aren't invariant to using one method or the other. Especially troublesome is last sentence therein ("This adds complexity, size and cost to the system, but removes the need to rotate the object."): why would one avoid rotating the object if it's a simpler, smaller and cheaper method?

Ngs111 (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

after reading this article, i still don't know how cone beam data are reconstructed!!!

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cone beam reconstruction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]