Talk:Conduction aphasia/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ajpolino (talk · contribs) 18:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Koridas: I'm happy to take on this review, but I'm a bit concerned about duplicating efforts since the previous GA review by Tom (LT) was just a couple of weeks ago. Could you clarify why a second review is sought? Do you feel the concerns of the first review have been addressed? Or are you seeking a second opinion? I'd just like to know so that we're all on the same page for this review. Thanks in advance for clarifying! I hope all is well during this strange time. Ajpolino (talk) 18:25, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ajpolino, I have fixed the issues asked by Tom. I have fixed the issues that blocked it from becoming GA. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 18:29, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdraw - On second thought, I don't really want to nominate it. Koridas (...Puerto Rico for statehood!) 18:31, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Koridas: As you wish. If you change your mind, you can renominate it any time. All the best Ajpolino (talk) 18:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank goodness. I really don't feel my concerns were addressed with any depth (or at all for that matter, particularly relating to comprehensiveness, images and ordering), and until they are I stand by my first review, which is that this article is not up to GA standard. No reflection on your editing at all Koridas, it's just that some articles need a bit more attention and often that doesn't just happen overnight. I wish you well on your wikivoyages, --Tom (LT) (talk) 18:45, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]