Talk:Condobolin railway station

Australia: New South Wales / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Condobolin railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The longitude quoted for Condobolin railway station seems to be incorrect. It is quoted as 148°9′12″ East, which (by the Haversine formula) would place it only 4.2km from Parkes (as the crow flies, on a great circle), whereas from the map it looks about 60km. Moreover, the town of Condolin has a quoted longitude of 147°8′58″ East (using this, haversine formula gives 59.23km to Parkes).

—Glevum (talk) 09:38, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done. It appears that someone mistyped 148° instead of 147° for the longitude. Deor (talk) 15:15, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]