Talk:Concubinatus

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because it is the other way around, they copied from Wikipedia (see oldid of Marriage in ancient Rome $ Concubinage). I have only made split, reviewed it (it was not written very well), and created a new page. --Grufo (talk) 20:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct of course. My apologies, I've removed the tag. --John B123 (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Grufo (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

This revert is inappropriate. There are several reliable sources that indicate that the concubinage sometimes also referred to relationships between free and slaves in the Roman context. If you feel the sources are not reliable enough, we can take them to WP:RS. WP:NPOV requires us to carefully state what reliable sources say. If the source contradicts other sources, then we attribute the viewpoint and make note of the contradiction.VR _talk 20:00, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Contubernium § NPOV. --Grufo (talk) 22:55, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source missing, contrast with other voice

Despite traditional Roman aversion against polygamy and the fact that according to the Roman law a man could not have a concubine while he had a wife -----> where is the source for this? The voice [[1]] clearly contradict this, with sources. --DenkoSekka (talk) 20:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@DenkoSekka: I haven't checked the other page, but here it is. --Grufo (talk) 16:05, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]