Talk:Concretion

This article was nominated for deletion on 28 August 2020. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Request for expansion

You should put more info on here cause my daughter needs it !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.209.3.20 (talk) 00:12, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Include in your post information that you think would be useful for this article. You can simply ask questions or ask for clarification, and maybe an editor will post. --KP Botany (talk) 06:23, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Natural?

This image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Septarian_Nodule.jpg Does anyone know if that is a natural formation completely, or if the coloring was put on by humans? It looks like the edges have been highlighted in black. I have no idea either way; but if anyone knows for certain that its a fully natural formation, I think that should be explained in the caption. 74.128.56.194 (talk) 13:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is all natural coloring. Wilson44691 (talk) 19:12, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkeetna Mountains Hadrosaur Paragraph

The paragraph about the Talkeetna Mountains Hadrosaur is far too specific to this one fossil dinosaur and discusses virtually nothing about the taphonomic aspects of concretions to be appropriate to the Wikipedia article on concretions. Furthermore, this paragraph only rehashes duplicate material found in the Matanuska Formation article. Therefore, I removed it. If such a section is to be added to the article about concretions, it needs to discuss the taphonomic aspects of concretions relative to vertebrate, invertebrate, and plant fossils in general instead aimlessly babbling on about a single fossil dinosaur fossil as the paragraph, which I removed, does.Paul H. (talk) 02:43, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Medical Concretions?

My doctor says I have a concretion in the back of my throat. It looks white and he says its from accumulated food and is related to my tonsils swelling due to mono. Shouldn't there be an article about this other concretion as well?75.129.91.157 (talk) 21:34, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Concretion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120304075635/http://allanmccollum.net/amcimages/mozley.html to http://allanmccollum.net/amcimages/mozley.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. — Gorthian (talk) 18:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Concretion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:27, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Concretion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trovants

I found out that there was once a separate page about Trovants that now redirects here. It's last edit (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trovant&oldid=278169908) contained some interesting and probably useful information, that is not included here. Shouldn't it be added, eg as another type of concretion? Or maybe in a new section? 212.160.172.85 (talk) 09:18, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In order to use the material in that now-redirected web page in a Wikipedia article, a verifiable, reliable source that clearly documents the statements made in the former article are needed. There is a lack of inline citations indicating any of the sources for specific statements made in it. In addition, the web pages in "external" links are both of dubious reliability and neither of them would be acceptable sources for Wikipedia. Paul H. (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect place name?

This article, Concretions, mentions "grove county, ks". Google Maps search for grove county ks indicates no such county. There is a grove township containing the Grove, KS community. BTW... This is an excellent article. (User talk:2001:5b0:2873:d838:3d8c:331e:c0e3:259c)

You are correct. "Grove County, KS" should be "Gove County, KS". Paul H. (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]