Talk:Computer case

Computing High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.

Packaging

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Packaging, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of containers, packaging, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PackagingWikipedia:WikiProject PackagingTemplate:WikiProject PackagingContainers articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Computer case was copied or moved into Computer tower with this edit on 00:38, 22 November 2022‎. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Hello

fans? hello?? no mention??????--Capsela 04:09, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbscrews

Some cases has Thumbscrews instead of normal screws. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Frap (talk • contribs) 14:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Screw Types?

well there are all kinds of ways to screw. Just think for minute....lol What types of screws are on/in the case? It seems to me that there are too many of them.--Alvin-cs ✉ 12:35, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Intrusion detection

Some computer case have intrusion detection? -- Frap 08:02, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parts of the case

What are the names of the case parts? Specifically, what is the name of the small tabs that close the case where an unused slot is? How are they called on a card?

I think by the small tabs that cover unused slots you mean the "blanking plate(s)"Lmcgregoruk (talk) 20:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a very good article

I'm going to consider beefing this up, and what's with all the Mac stuff? Cases aren't an exclusively Mac innovation, nor is their drive forward so Mac-bound, I'm going to compile some kind of time line of various improvements, feel free to suggest anything. Revrant 02:30, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand why out of three images there are two that are of Mac's. I am a big fan of Mac's, but this is certainly not very reprsentative of the majority. I can understand the iMac's inclusion, it is fairly radical, and there is room for diversity, but the Power Mac image makes no sense to me. (08:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC))

aesthetics vs. functionality

I came tot his article in search f confirmation/denial as well explanation of heat dissipation properties of desktop vs tower cases, but all I found was some generic description of the insides and lots of talk about how they look like :/

--TiagoTiago 17:23, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

The formatting on this page was a little un-standard (randomly bold, italic, hyperlinked, or combination), so I adjusted most of it. Entbark (talk) 22:44, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Case Sizes

24" is very large for 3-4 external bays. You could quite easily get 6 or 7 into a case that tall. I suspect some of the average sizes stated on the article have been exaggerated. Gunstar hero (talk) 17:24, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe it's just me, but seems like these numbers are its length rather than its height. I could have sworn my case is a mid-tower and it doesn't have that height, but it has that length. 06:56, 3 February 2009 (PST)

Computer Case Function

The article is too generic. A more technical explanation of a computer case is needed. For example, I remember reading that a case is usually metal because it keeps the EM interference from going out and coming in to a minimum.174.6.130.25 (talk) 13:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)BeeCier[reply]

Dubious

I added the "dubious" link because when I shopped for one, FlexATX was hard to find and expensive, and the slightly larger microATX was dominant. Maybe this varies over time. Perhaps we should not claim which is most common, but simply list the options. —Długosz (talk) 20:02, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Screwless Cases

Screwless cases existed a long time ago; I remember once disassembling a Siemens Nixdorf (german computer fabricant) about ten or twelve years ago featuring a completely screwless design (except for the motherboard). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.215.218.29 (talk) 17:26, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise... I may still have a noname screwless case from the mini AT form factor era, I'll see if I can find and photograph it. Andrewa (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Desktops vs Towers

It would be quite helpful if the article listed the difference between a desktop and a tower, and why towers became prevalent. -mattbuck (Talk) 19:03, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

mid- vs. minitower

From what I know the difference between a midtower and a minitower ist that the forst supports normal ATX fornmfactor motherboards, while the latter only supports µATX. --MrBurns (talk) 23:08, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ATX popularity

I've tagged this assertion as needing a citation. My strong impression is that the general public are not buying full size ATX PCs en masse. PC World, etc have more mATX towers in the showroom than anything else, and businesses largely use even smaller form factors. At the very least we're missing a key qualifier that ATX is popular with home builders. Chris (talk) 15:25, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Computer case. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029213309/http://voices.yahoo.com/the-cpu-versus-computer-tower-case-7745986.html?cat=15 to http://voices.yahoo.com/the-cpu-versus-computer-tower-case-7745986.html?cat=15

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Terminology for the case

Base unit is already used for relays and other systems, it's not common enough to warrant mention here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.250.0.109 (talk) 01:53, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pruning some older case images

I think that the gallery section of this article has had some image creep and could use pruning of unnecessary images.

Here are the ones I suggest removing and the reason:

File:Cooler Master 690 II Advanced Nvidia Edition Mid Tower.jpg - It has an obscured view of the inside and the newer case images are better photographs.
File:Beige mini tower case.jpg - A disgusting looking case that is very hard to gauge the size of due to it being taken at an off angle. Poorly lighted photograph as well.
File:ATXDesktop.jpeg - Poorly lighted and other irrelevant things in the picture. Outdated case that is likely not to be relevant.
File:Example of an Enthusiast's PC.jpg - Blurry and doesn't show the inside clearly. The newer image shows it significantly better.

There are also too many photos of the IBM Personal System/2 when there only really needs to be one or two, max. Unless anyone objects, I will probably be deleting them from the article._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 21:31, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]