Talk:Compression of genomic sequencing data

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Divon lan (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Compression of genomic sequencing data article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 9 March 2012 by reviewer Hallows AG (talk · contribs).

Inappropriate use of "re-sequencing" in title of article

The technical term "re-sequencing" is so specialized that, not only is it defined nowhere in Wikipedia, there are only 3 occurrences of the term in the article on DNA Sequencing -- only one of which uses the hyphenated form. Indeed, it makes little sense to include the qualifier at all since "genomic data" necessarily implies base pair positions. Jim Bowery (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and I’ve taken the liberty of moving the page since nobody has objected in the ~1.5 years since your comment.--klmr (talk) 14:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Title - sentence casing?

Shouldn't the title have sentence casing?

--Mortense (talk) 00:38, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

undislosed COI by an author

The editor that added the genozip section has previously disclosed a COI on other articles featuring this tool, but failed to do that here. Also the compression percentage of up to 99% for bam and fastq files is not found in the provided reference, so it strongly seems like self promotion, especially since the tool is commercial. 130.226.236.6 (talk) 12:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]