Talk:Comprehensive emergency management
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
[edit]This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kelmojo. Peer reviewers: Samo56.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
[edit]This article is a stub and probably doesn't need to be too much more than a stub, since it is a rather tangential and self-explanatory concept. Nonetheless, I think it can be improved with a greater contrast of the earlier civil defense philosophy and the emerging of the "all-hazards" approach.
{{Globalize/USA}} added
[edit]I will try to broaden this article's perspective to include other countries' views in the coming weeks. I know at least in NZ has more to do with the mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery cycle than any specific regulatory matters. --TimClicks (talk) 07:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Comprehensive emergency management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071227071919/http://www.training.fema.gov/emiweb/IS/is700.asp to http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is700.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:30, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Revisions to Current Definition
[edit]The current definition of Comprehensive emergency management is not at all concise. It is full of drawn out sentences filled with comma after comma of additional information. The sentences are very long, they need to be reformatted to make better sense of exactly what is Comprehensive emergency management. The definition also talks about CEM being the rise and fall of different systems in the US. There needs to be a more in depth history of how that took place, why that took place, and who made those decisions? CEM’s main intro describes the definition as various laws throughout the US, a better definition would describe and give definition of those laws and how they are currently being used. There are many changes being described in the definition as the birth of certain departments and the fall of other departments along the way of the creation of CEM. There needs to be historical dates set in the definition in order to tell the reader exactly why those changes were made. There needs to better a precise description of the “emergency” plans set in place by the CEM for different types of emergencies that may occur. Another suggestion would be to describe how the leaders of the CEM spell out the plans to the general public when disasters or emergencies do happen. All in all this definition needs to give better explanation of why the CEM has changed over the years and what the plan exactly means to the general public. All in all a new version needs to be made in order to make proper sense of CEM. Samo56 (talk) 05:08, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comprehensive emergency management. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090304051532/http://www.jumpjet.info/CEM/02/General-Preparedness.htm to http://www.jumpjet.info/CEM/02/General-Preparedness.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)