Talk:Compound-term processing
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
This looks very much like an advertisement. There is no supporting material for the primary topic. The company named as coining the term that is of the topic of the article is referenced multiple times. The first footnoted reference is to a white paper on the same company's website. A significant amount of the text is dedicated to claims that one particular information retrieval method that is better than other methods. No evidence is presented to support the claims. 146.214.103.189 (talk) 20:18, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- This is ad, see Concept Search history, User:Kku created the page and linked it to a commercial offering. i⋅am⋅amz3 (talk) 00:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
The term "word independence" is used without being defined.
[edit]The term "word independence should be defined I think. TimoleonWash (talk) 09:09, 8 April 2015 (UTC)