Talk:Composite Health Care System

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This article lacks an infobox. You may wish to add one, so that the article resembles the standard display for this subject. This talk page may contain the banner of a relevant project, that provides the standardized infobox for this type of article. See also Category:Infobox templates, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Infoboxes.

Untitled

This article is about AHLTA and should be moved to that page. MUMPS is a hierarchical database not relational.

AHLTA has no page on the Wikipedia. I wanted to create one, but didn't since creation now requires a login. What is MUMPS?71.105.42.21 00:16, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you look in wikipedia, it tells you all about MUMPS. It is a programming language developed especially for hospitals. It uses pointers to navigate through the tables in the databases. It is a very efficient in saving space and only creates space in the files as needed. Some patient's file would be very small and others could be very large depending on how may visits, prescriptions, x-rays, etc.24.94.90.51 07:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are many military webpages dedicated to using AHLTA. Here is one that is open to the general public. You should find it most informative: http://www.usafp.org/CHCS-II-AHLTA-Information-FAQs.htm 24.94.90.51 07:43, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AHLTA VS CHCS VS MUMPS

Hello all - this page should not be renamed or moved to an AHLTA page because CHCS is not AHLTA. AHLTA is a new system that "interfaces" with the legacy CHCS system. At some point the legacy CHCS system will not be avilable to end users but this entry in wikipedia is intended to describe the legacy CHCS system.

MUMPS is the programming language used to implement the legacy CHCS system and is therefore mentioned in this entry Akuma624 (talk) 20:54, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the article on CHCS?

For a system which was sold to the military by SAIC, at the cost billions of dollars, based on software which the VA already paid for, which takes weeks to train people to get started, this is a very short article.

The article about AHLTA has no primary sources, nor is there any about CHCS for that matter.

This article doesn't even meet the barest level of Wikipedia acceptance quality and should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.140.37.77 (talk) 02:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Replying

i beg to differ...umless you did not read the original post?.. as a current employee for DOD. The literature is spot on!! 104.222.56.140 (talk) 11:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]