Jump to content

Talk:Complicated (Rihanna song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Till I Go Home (talk · contribs) 11:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will review the article:) Till I Go Home (talk) 11:05, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Aaron You Da One 11:26, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • "..it was one of the best to be included on Loud" --> it was one of the best tracks to be included on Loud.
     Done Aaron You Da One
  • "the song chart at number 50 on the South Korea Gaon International Chart." ...I think you mean "charted"?
     Done Aaron You Da One

Background and inspiration

  • I think it would be better if you replaced "relatable" with "applicable".
     Done Aaron You Da One

Composition

  • "Mackay also noted that the singer.." remove "also"
     Done Aaron You Da One
  • "Chad Grischow of IGN noted that Rihanna" replace noted with something else (like stated) because of repetition.
     Done Aaron You Da One

Critical reception

  • "reminiscent of songs by English pop girl group, Sugababes" -> Remove "pop" wikilink per WP:OVERLINK.
     Done Aaron You Da One
  • "labeling it as "cluttered" and the albums "low-point". The correct grammar is "album's", not "albums".
     Done Aaron You Da One
  • "Colin Gentry of 4Music described the song as the highlight of the album" -> Colin Gentry of 4Music named the song the highlight of the album
     Done Aaron You Da One

Overall

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Overall a well-written article, issues have been addressed, passing GAN. Till I Go Home (talk)
Thanks. Aaron You Da One 13:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]