Talk:Complex Networks

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Untitled section 1

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL This page is largely written by the publisher (User:Complexmag) and differs markedly in character from other wikipedia magazine articles. In particular, sentences like "In the wake of Complex's success, established publishing houses like" are un-encyclopedic and reflect the publisher's point of view. There is no mention of the editorial board, nor of their overly aggressive marketing campaign. (apologies for not logging in to put the POV template on the main page) --Djmitche 21:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the overly aggressive marketing campaign, my wife has been receiving free copies for months now. --Akwhitacre (talk) 20:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Complex (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221170615/http://www.ahoodie.com/2013/01/29/pyrex-vision-is-a-joke/ to http://www.ahoodie.com/2013/01/29/pyrex-vision-is-a-joke/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:01, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 30 May 2020

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed; WP:SMALLDETAILS is applied. BD2412 T 17:19, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Complex Networks (company) → Complex Networks – The capitalization and plural form is enough to differentiate from the article Complex network. A disambiguation template the top of the page should also be enough. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥) 17:30, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom and WP:SMALLDETAILS. - Station1 (talk) 21:58, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization should be sufficient to prevent both titles so at least I'd support making "Complex Networks" a DAB page. Note that the plural doesn't really distinguish since Complex network(s) seems to be a count noun like cars but anyway DIFFCAPS is probably enough. Crouch, Swale (talk) 09:53, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
complex networks In ictu oculi (talk) 16:45, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I would like to point out that the pages Breakfast television and Breakfast Television are titled the same but are completely separate pages, so I believe "Complex Networks" is enough to differentiate from complex network. A hatnote would be a great addition as well. Limmidy (talk) 03:36, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Gameranx" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gameranx and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 20#Gameranx until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Neocorelight (Talk) 15:12, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]