Talk:Comparison of phytocannabinoids

Chemicals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cannabis Low‑importance

	Cannabis portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

THC-Octyl instead of THC-JD for Tetrahydrocannabioctyl

For for Tetrahydrocannabioctyl (THC-C8), the term THC-JD is a made up marketing name by a single person who likely doesn't even have real THC-Octyl, don't let marketers push the name. Proper nicknames for Tetrahydrocannabioctyl include THC-Octyl and THC-C8 and Octyl-THC.

People trying to add unreferenced claims that they are psychedelic, likely associated with marketers. Gettinglit (talk) 23:56, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Gettinglit: Please restore "Quasi-psychedelic" to the columns that you removed from the "Other use" column for existing cannabinoids in this article. Please don't yell in the edit summary, and be silly:

I created this article, Comparison of phytocannabinoids.
I've added 36 phytocannabinoids/acids to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cannabinoids recently. I did not know that tetrahydrocannabioctyl was synthetic when I added it (see Talk:Tetrahydrocannabioctyl).

You could thank me instead if you want. I'm sorry if I did a human error. --Bawanio (talk) 22:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Bawanio they're not "quasi-psychedelics". Prior to the 1980s THC itself was hypothesized to be a atypical hallucinogenic before the endocannabinoid system was disocovered but they are not considered atypical hallucinogenics anymore. There are marketers in the USA trying to spread false information that some are psychdelic in effect or other claims for sales and some are doing so by editing wikipedia, some marketers have even made the pages for some cannabinoids.

THC-Octly is naturally occuring in very small amounts but the nickname THC-JD is made up marketing nonsense of synthetic noid soup that hasn't been proven to actually contain any THC-Octyl. Gettinglit (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]