Talk:Comparison of Cantonese transcription systems

Hong Kong Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Hong Kong may be able to help!

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (296)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,513) • Stub-Class articles (6,679)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (378) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,337)

Critical IPA errors

The characters given as examples for some of the phonemes are matched with the wrong IPA entirely.

將 is a homophone of 張 and so share with it the initial [tɕ].
An example of [ts] in Cantonese would instead be 戰. [ʈʂ] which is present in Cantonese with characters like 中, identical in pronunciation to the Mandarin, is not given at all.
鏘 does not have initial [tsʰ] but rather [ʈʂʰ] which is also the initial for 昌.
A correct example for [tsʰ] would instead be 車 or 炒.
Instead, this chart gives the initial for 昌 as [tɕʰ], i.e. the Mandarin Pinyin 'q', which is a phoneme absent from Cantonese entirely. (By the way, as a native speaker who learned Mandarin late, that sound was quite difficult to learn to pronounce).
是 is pronounced identically to 士 with initial [s], and [ɕ] is absent from Cantonese.

Given how many critical errors are in this chart, I would strongly advise sources to be provided for it. I am not sure if perhaps the pronunciations given here reflect a different dialect of Cantonese aside from Hong Kong Cantonese or Guangdong Cantonese. Sol Pacificus (talk) 04:46, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]