Jump to content

Talk:Compact Kinetic Energy Missile

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Future fighting par

[edit]

"Future Fighting

The CKEM is designed to defeat Explosive Reactive Armor and Active Protection Systems. It is also intended to be smaller and lighter than current missile systems."

This is based on my knowledge of military technology not visible from published info and has no reference. C-KEM uses a kinetic, high velocity approach to armor penetration that is not susceptible to early ("light") ERA and early APS, but many new ERA ("heavy ERA") and APS developments ("heavy ERA in service since man years) are effective against APFSDS and the equivalent CKEM. I personally like the CKEM concept, but this part of the article sounds like public relations bravado, not like actual information. Maybe CKEM has enough penetration capability and would be overkill enogh to penetrate even despite heavy ERA and APS) - the present text is at the very least misleading, though. I'll delete this part if no source will e found in the next time. There's no source anyway. Lastdingo (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

addition:; CKEM could also overcome APS with ripple fire (saturation) - that would be a method to overcome APS by the mode of employment, not by the missile hardware itself. Again, I think the statement in the article is misleading at best. Lastdingo (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Compact Kinetic Energy Missile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]