Talk:Comp check
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
it seems like a very good article could be created if the Comparables article and this were merged. Minnaert 01:49, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Good idea to merge. Do you want to go ahead? With appropriate cross refs. it makes sense. First define the term and its usage, then relate to appraisers' use via comp check. Viva-Verdi 20:01, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Please, DON'T MERGE! This has a very different usage from comparables, and I feel makes more people aware of the pressure that appraisers face everyday. Appraizur 05:33, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Ditto. I've significantly updated the Comparables page. --Thesurveyor 02:26, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- I agree. Let's use the words to educate the public.--Appraiser 21:46, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Please keep the entries SEPARATE, as they are very different. --FeistyApprzr 16:11, 5 July, 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Comp Check. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070216045335/http://commerce.appraisalfoundation.org/html/2006%20USPAP/ao19.htm to http://commerce.appraisalfoundation.org/html/2006%20USPAP/ao19.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:13, 11 August 2017 (UTC)