Talk:Community season 4

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Advanced Introduction to Finality

Is there evidence to support that "Advanced Introduction to Finality" is the finale? The source only says "Episode 411" but makes no mention of being episode 13. Am I missing something? Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:22, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The production number is 411, but it'll air as the finale. Just look at the two Twitter links used for the source of the writer of the episode ([1], [2]). Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. I hadn't seen those two tweets earlier. Kevinbrogers (talk) 05:38, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Episode Descriptions

Are the episode descriptions from http://www.thefutoncritic.com/showatch/community/listings/ the official descriptions? On the specific episode pages they state that the information is directly from NBC, but I'd rather not add them if they'll just be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.96.85.204 (talk) 16:44, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, those are the official episode descriptions sent out by NBC. Regardless, we just can't copy and paste that content here, per WP:COPYVIO. Content on Wikipedia has to written in your own words. Drovethrughosts (talk) 16:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification, I was unaware of the copying issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.198.9.59 (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please try to be accurate in the reception section

Someone keeps reverting edits to describe the reception for the season as "lukewarm." Look, I know it wasn't popular among fans, but the fact is, objectively and factually, the season received generally positive critical reception. (Even scoring the same score as Season One on Metacritic) Please do not keep reverting the article to read "lukewarm", as it's not accurate. MaximumMadnessStixon (talk) 22:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very good point. Even the current form is not quite accurate. How is the reception "mixed" with 69% on Metacritic ("generally favorable reviews") and 65% on Rotten Tomatoes (fresh)? With a show with less baggage, it would be something like "generally positive", or "mixed to positive". Examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Head_On_(1998_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hellion_(film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ibiza_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:6000:1205:C0BB:802A:89A3:F3C8:1D0E (talk) 02:07, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]