Talk:Community Banana Stand
This article was nominated for deletion on 5 November 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
A fact from Community Banana Stand appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- ... that in downtown Seattle, approximately 8,000 bananas are given away daily by Amazon "banistas" (pictured) under the supervision of their "bananagers"? Source: WSJ
- Reviewed: Alto Velo Claim
- Comment:
I think it could be a good hook for WP:DYKAPRIL, or it could serve as a regular hook as well; let me know what you think. Feel free to suggest any improvements that would make it funnier/more absurd.
Created by King of Hearts (talk). Self-nominated at 04:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing: - Hook should be cited at the end of the sentence, but we're almost there
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: Nice work! I think this would be better suited as the trailing hook in a normal set—it is funny, but it seems more quirky-corny than April-fools'-day misleading and absurd. The hook should be cited at the end of the sentence, especially because it contains direct quotes. Well done! The article was informative and a-peel-ing (look, i'm sorry, okay?). theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 03:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: Fixed. Sure, regular DYK it is, then. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:01, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Short-ish, but fine for DYK. Otherwise new enough, long enough, well cited. GTG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 13:58, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Seems I did my review at the same time... Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- agreed theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 23:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Seems I did my review at the same time... Maury Markowitz (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- C-Class Food and drink articles
- Low-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- C-Class Washington articles
- Low-importance Washington articles
- WikiProject Washington articles
- C-Class Seattle articles
- Low-importance Seattle articles
- WikiProject Seattle articles
- WikiProject United States articles