Talk:Communist Party of Australia (1971)

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Communist Party of Australia (1971) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tony Oldfield

Did he actually run as a CPA candidate? The ABC website seems to list him (on the ballot at least) as being unaffiliated - http://www.abc.net.au/elections/nsw/2012/council/?page=Auburn#Council I'm not doubting that Mr Oldfield is a CPA member and it's probably legitimate to count him on the ticker since we normally change the numbers if someone did this in a state or federal parliament but perhaps the wording in the article needs to be changed slightly? Tigerman2005 (talk) 02:56, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Splitters - ACP

There was recently another split, with splitting members forming the “Australian Communist Party”. This should be reflected in the article.Locochoko (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s their website for anyone interested - https://www.auscp.org.au/militantmonthly Locochoko (talk) 13:15, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Communist Party redirects to the old CPA, so I have removed the link. Unless someone makes an article for the ACP, there is no point in having a link.--Jack Upland (talk) 10:05, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There was a page for the Australian Communist Party but it was deleted. Catiline52 (talk) 11:09, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Typical. Was it deleted by the ACP, the CPA, the CAP, the PAC, or the CIA?--Jack Upland (talk) 11:11, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just typical non-notability reasons, not many sources on the topic since it's probably just half a dozen people. Catiline52 (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As of 2022 the ACP is probably still too small and not sufficiently notable to warrant an article as mentioned in the previous comment 11893945AA (talk) 09:04, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]