Talk:Common Reporting Standard

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation articles

Finance & Investment Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Low-importance).

What is TIN?

From the "Information to be exchanged" section: "... a) the name, address, TIN and date and place of ...". What is TIN? Please provide a full name before using an abbreviation. --Forage (talk) 16:58, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

here [1] Jazi Zilber (talk) 20:39, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TIN is Tax Identification Number. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.195.34.170 (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add: loopholes in CRS

http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21722679-increasingly-popular-loophole-global-tax-compliance-regime-how-becoming

Shaded0 (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To add...? Why dont you add it ? you seem to have the subscription to read more than the title of this Economist article from May 25 2017, How becoming a Hong Kong pensioner can save you tax, which BTW you didnt provide for a start of a full ref ...--Wuerzele (talk) 09:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure - I took a crack at it, although I had some difficulty summarizing and it could use a second glance for clarity. If you're curious, the Economist has a 3-5 articles one can read per week/month before it throws a paywall up (you might need to register for an account but it's free). Otherwise Google cache might have it indexed. Shaded0 (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think it is missing.

There is a vast literature of the various aspects of loopholes and enforcement.

This article is about a general procedure that tackles the problem naturally for the vast majority of cases.

the Economist piece is about some very exotic exceptions. This is interesting for a newspaper. But not for an encyclopedia Jazi Zilber (talk) 16:45, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Common Reporting Standard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140514041621/http://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchange-of-tax-information/automatic-exchange-financial-account-information-common-reporting-standard.pdf to http://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchange-of-tax-information/Automatic-Exchange-Financial-Account-Information-Common-Reporting-Standard.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

List of countries

Is Pakistan also part of crs Asifhameed643 (talk) 04:48, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Guinea is not listed anywhere. —Jerome Potts (talk) 12:22, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2 September 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move this page, therefore, not moved. Additionally, a redirect has been created as requested. (closed by non-admin page mover) Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 12:03, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Common Reporting Standard → Automatic exchange of information – Seems to be the most common name used, both by media and authorities (example). 144.85.129.105 (talk) 20:24, 2 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Iffy★Chat -- 22:04, 10 September 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 14:10, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Linguistically, automatic exchange is more apt.

However, historically the common standard wording was commonly more used. And there is a reason, and automatic exchange is a general thing. Besides including other subject, it would also encompass the US other system of exchange with everyone which is a distinct entity altogether.

To refer to the OECD tax related exchange system Common Reporting Standard is more pointed.

You can see on the OECD portal that it refers to everything on the system as CRS (acronym) things.

Google searches for both phrases gives back an equal number of hits. on web. When searching news, however, CRS has 2,370,000 hits whereas AEOI hits 190,000

Proposal create a redirect page for Automatic exchange of information and add here on top. sometimes referred to as 'Automatic exchange of information' Jazi Zilber (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"DAC2" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect DAC2 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 24 § DAC2 until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 02:22, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]