Talk:Commodore 64x

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Commodore 64x article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Untitled

All the images there are of the C64x are 3D renders, it obviously not entered production yet, it may be a hoax or just a project seeking for consumer interest or even funding. Petruza (talk) 14:46, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, the article contains some text, e.g. overwhelming demand, that also make it look like someone from Commodore's marketing division set up the page. --24.12.245.4 (talk) 01:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Did the C64x ever reach the hands of those who pre-ordered it? All the referenced sources mention pre-sales, not actual "sales". Also, a court ruled in 2013 that the "Commodore" trademark license was invalid (Asiarim and its licensing subsidiary never were in a position to grant it). https://casetext.com/case/choldings-bv-v-asiarim-corp Amiga1985 (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Commodore 64x. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110714003638/http://www.commodoreusa.net/CUSA_C64.aspx to http://www.commodoreusa.net/CUSA_C64.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]