Talk:Commercial fish feed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2019 and 6 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Graceg22. Peer reviewers: Mfink1210, Vleon208.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:06, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feeds for farmed fish → Fish feed — Fish feed is the usual name. It currently redirects to Fish food, which is a restricted article about food for aquarium fish. Fish food could subsequently be merged with Fish feed. At any rate, that would be a matter for further consideration, and does not affect the validity of the current request to correctly rename the main article for commercial fish feed. - Epipelagic (talk) 23:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To many people "fish feed" = "fish food" = what they buy for pet fish in a home aquarium. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 23:21, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. In common English, fish feed might be ambiguous at best, and at worst would be a synonym for fish food so it's in neither case a good title for this article. Maybe a two-way DAB should go there if it's the normal name for commercial fish feed as claimed? The two articles both need work, and should link more prominently to each other, but they are both good and distinct topics with plenty of material and a merge is a very bad idea IMO. (And that doesn't affect the validity of my oppose vote.) Andrewa (talk) 14:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Commercial fish feed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]