Talk:Coming of Age in Karhide

Coming of Age in Karhide has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 21, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Coming of Age in Karhide appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 August 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Ursula K. Le Guin's short story "Coming of Age in Karhide" depicts socially acceptable sexual promiscuity?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Coming of Age in Karhide.

Wikipedia

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

Is the title a reference to this, by any chance? FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 15:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting! I was unaware of that volume. It is not mentioned anywhere in the critical commentary on this story (that I am aware of), but Le Guin's father was an anthropologist, and it is quite likely that she was aware of the earlier book. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, FiredanceThroughTheNight. Vanamonde (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Coming of Age in Karhide/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sagecandor (talk · contribs) 14:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll do this one. Sagecandor (talk) 14:34, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sagecandor, many thanks for picking up the review. I'm afraid my participating on Wikipedia is going to be severely limited during the next ten days, and I would ask your indulgence with respect to responding to any comments during this period. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 12:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Successful good article nomination

I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of December 21, 2016, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: I've actually read the book The Left Hand of Darkness for a science fiction English literature class. I was pleasantly surprised to see this short story article. I see the nominator is the same editor that took that book article to Featured Article -- most impressive. The writing style here is excellent, not just good. It is a short story, so I see no problem with the article size or intro size here. I would maybe perhaps just expand the intro section a wee bit more here, mentioning specifically a couple of the individual reviewers and perhaps a summary of their individual thoughts briefly.

2. Verifiable?: Every single thing is cited to appropriate references with good job on the citation style for both the References and Sources sections. I especially like that the Plot section is all backed up to citations, great job here.

3. Broad in coverage?: For a short story article, this article has sections equivalent to a good article for a novel or film. Setting, Plot, Themes, Publication and Reception, good References and Sources sections. Good job on thoroughness here.

4. Neutral point of view?: Every assertion in the article is backed up appropriately to sources. I've read the book The Left Hand of Darkness and I'm familiar with the author and the genre. It is a matter of fact tone and yes the article gives a good neutral presentation.

5. Stable? Talk page not very active, one question from August 2016, answered politely. Article edit history stable going back to July 2016.

6. Images?: No images used. Suggest a free-use image of the author.

Overall, a good article. Maybe more research could be done for further expansion, I'm not sure. Can expand the intro. Can add a free-use image of the author. I personally haven't done the research into additional scholarly sources to see if there's anything else that can be done towards featured article. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it Good article reassessed. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.— Sagecandor (talk) 18:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sagecandor: many thanks for the review. I think your suggestions are excellent ones, and since I have internet access again, I will implement them shortly. Regards, Vanamonde (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And done. Thanks again.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coming of Age in Karhide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160808094902/http://www.strangehorizons.com/2003/20030512/ekumen.shtml to http://www.strangehorizons.com/2003/20030512/ekumen.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]