Jump to content

Talk:Coming Up to Breathe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleComing Up to Breathe has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 27, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
June 22, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 16, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the string sections on MercyMe's 2006 album Coming Up to Breathe were recorded at Abbey Road Studios by the London Session Orchestra?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AJona1992 (talk · contribs) 03:47, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Failing article solely because the prose (and WP:MOS issues) is not up to GA standards. Here are a few examples (these are just a few, there maybe even more)
  • Coming Up to Breathe is the fifth major label, full-length studio album from MercyMe.
  • Released in on April 25, 2006,
  • Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews from critics
  • "Something Like You" has been compared to the sound of U2 (particularly the song "Where The Streets Have No Name"),[6] while "3:42 a.m. (Writer's Block)" has been described as 'soulful classic rock'
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    "Background" has basically every period cited with FN#1 which makes the article look even more clumsy
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Saying "Coming Up to Breathe received almost universally positive reviews." is being biased
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Active users have been reverting vandalism, which was last done back in mid November 2011
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    File:Mercyme cutb.jpg does not comply with WP:NFCC; its rational is very very weak and does not give a suitable reasoning on why a non-free artwork gives any educational value. The second file completely fails WP:NFCC.
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I suggest you fixed all of these concerns, get it copy edited, allow others to give it a WP:PR and then re-nominate at a later date. Best, Jonayo! Selena 4 ever 23:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Coming Up to Breathe/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:


Infobox

[edit]

Lead

[edit]

Background

[edit]
  • No issues

Composition

[edit]

Critical reception

[edit]
  • No issues

Singles

[edit]
  • An album cut from the album, "No More No Less", spent one frame on the Hot Christian Songs chart, debuting and peaking at number thirty..[31] Get rid of extra period at end of statement

Release

[edit]

Track listing

[edit]
  • No issues

Personnel

[edit]
  • No issues

Charts and certifications

[edit]
  • No issues

References

[edit]
  • If you mention a work or publisher in a reference and it is wiki-linked, do not wiki-link it for further references
  • Only italicize publications in the "work=" parameter
  • Proofread all of these to ensure errors are not made; for a guideline to follow, use WP:REFERENCE


After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put the article on hold at this time. There are a few prose issues, and things mostly just need to be proofread in the references section for this article to pass. I will give you the general seven days to fix mistakes, address points I have made, and/or ask me any questions that you have. Rp0211 (talk2me) 18:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All issues have now been addressed, so I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work you are doing! Rp0211 (talk2me) 01:46, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

Can you please contact Oshwah or another administrator to protect this page if I ever keep reverting edits, Binksternet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Better Than My Life (talkcontribs) 20:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]